The Grants Pass ruling and Hawaiʻi: what the Supreme Court changed about camping laws

On June 28, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court decided City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, the most important court ruling on homelessness in a generation. It ended a rule that had limited how cities in nine western states, Hawaiʻi among them, could enforce laws against sleeping and camping in public. Here is what the Court decided, what it did not decide, and what still governs enforcement on Oʻahu.
The background: Martin v. Boise
Hawaiʻi's federal courts sit in the Ninth Circuit. In 2018, in Martin v. City of Boise, that court held that the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment prevents a city from criminally punishing people for sleeping outside on public property when they have no access to shelter. In practice, the rule tied enforcement of camping bans to the number of available shelter beds. The Ninth Circuit later applied similar reasoning to civil fines and exclusion orders in a case brought against Grants Pass, a small city in southern Oregon.
Cities across the West argued the rule was unworkable: how many beds count, what if a person refuses a bed, and who decides whether someone is "involuntarily" homeless? Advocates argued it was a minimal protection against punishing people for having nowhere to go.
What the Supreme Court decided
By a 6 to 3 vote, in an opinion by Justice Neil Gorsuch, the Court reversed the Ninth Circuit. Its main conclusions:
- Camping is conduct, not status. Under the 1962 case Robinson v. California, a state cannot punish someone simply for a status such as addiction. The majority held that laws regulating camping on public property punish conduct, even if a person's circumstances make it hard to avoid.
- The penalties were not cruel and unusual. Fines and short jail terms of the kind Grants Pass imposed are not the sort of punishment the Eighth Amendment forbids, even as applied to people who are involuntarily homeless.
- The Martin framework is gone. The Court criticized the bed-count test as unworkable and left these policy choices to elected officials.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a dissent, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, arguing that punishing people for sleeping outside when they have nowhere else to go punishes them for being homeless.
The case in brief
- Name: City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. Johnson, No. 23-175.
- Decided: June 28, 2024, 6 to 3.
- Holding: enforcing generally applicable laws against camping on public property does not violate the Eighth Amendment's Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause.
- Effect in Hawaiʻi: the Martin v. Boise limit no longer applies.
What the decision did not decide
The ruling is narrower than some headlines suggested. It addressed the Eighth Amendment's Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause. It did not address other constitutional protections that may apply to enforcement, as law firm and academic summaries such as the University of North Carolina School of Government's analysis have noted. Among the rules that remain:
- Property protections. The Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments protect personal property against unreasonable seizure and destruction without due process. In the Ninth Circuit, Lavan v. City of Los Angeles (2012) applied these protections to belongings of unhoused people left temporarily on sidewalks. Honolulu's own ordinances require written notice before most property is impounded and storage before disposal; see our guide to belongings and the stored property ordinance.
- Disability law. Federal disability rights laws still apply to how services and enforcement are designed.
- State law. Hawaiʻi's constitution, statutes and court decisions can give more protection than the federal floor.
- Local ordinances. Every city ordinance has its own limits, hours, notice requirements and penalties, which officers must follow.
What changed on Oʻahu
For Honolulu, the practical effect is that the City and State no longer need to show available shelter before citing or arresting someone for violating a law against camping or sleeping in a public place. Laws already on the books, such as the sit-lie bans in Waikīkī and other business districts (see sidewalks, parks and sit-lie rules), are less exposed to Eighth Amendment challenges than before.
That legal room does not dictate a policy. Elected officials still choose how much to rely on enforcement and how much on outreach, shelter and housing. The City's public messaging around its May 2026 Point-in-Time count emphasized outreach teams and shelter capacity, and the State has built kauhale villages as a low-barrier alternative to the street. Critics of enforcement-heavy approaches point out that citations and arrests can make it harder for people to keep IDs, belongings and appointments, and that fines people cannot pay can lead to warrants.
What this means for people living outside
- Know the local rule. Rules differ by place and time: a park with closing hours, a district with a daytime sit-lie ban, a sidewalk where obstructions are removed.
- Protect documents and essentials. Keep IDs, medications and phone with you or stored with a service provider.
- Ask for help early. Outreach workers, including the City's CORE teams, can help with shelter options before enforcement happens.
- Get legal advice for specific problems. Legal aid organizations and civil rights groups can advise on citations, property seizures and court dates. This article is general information, not legal advice.
For neighbors and voters
Grants Pass moved the debate from the courts to councils and legislatures. That makes public participation more important: testimony on bills, comments at neighborhood boards and questions to candidates about what they would do for people with nowhere to sleep. Our guide to helping well includes civic routes alongside volunteering.
Sources
- Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School, City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, 603 U.S. ___ (2024), opinion text.
- Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinion, No. 23-175 (PDF).
- UNC School of Government, Grants Pass: local government authority and the constitutionality of laws against camping or sleeping in public.
Rights & public spaceSidewalks, parks and sit-lie
Sit-lie bans, park hours, the lodging ordinance and sidewalk rules, and the debate over them.
Rights & public spaceBelongings and sweeps
Notice, impoundment, storage and recovery: the city rules that govern belongings on public property.
Getting helpCORE and street outreach
EMTs and community health workers on non-violent calls: what CORE does and how to reach it.